we talk books

the reason for this ontology of truth as represented as not truth is that it is in accord with pragmatic and proposition and pleasure and pain, scientific truth is according to the propensity of disposition of these principals in conjunctive with continuous coefficient, the alteration is of the nature of the identity of pleasure and pain in anticipation being pessimistic or the opposite, and thus we have the propensity of objective seeking and so forth as within the ontology of this sort.

consequential a prior cognition and the consequent action has more to do with the fundamental foundation to truth and falsehood than does its ontology.