Trump's Admin Epstein Files release failure!
Guess what precentage the Trump Admin has so far released of the Epstein Files before making a disclaimer that all the [REDACTED] statements in it about Donald J Trump are untrue...

"Some of these documents contain untrue and sensationalist claims made against President Trump that were submitted to the FBI right before the 2020 election. If they had a shred of credibility, they certainly would have been weaponized against President Trump already"

The first person to the closest percentage wins a bunch of Steam Points!
< >
Viser 115 av 15 kommentarer
69%
Lime 9 timer siden 
as a goth, i've been commonly mistaken as cosplaying as the epstein files. its not fair i seek recompense
Opprinnelig skrevet av Vinz Clortho:
69%

Cold...

"Donald Trump is listed as a passenger on at least eight flights between 1993 and 1996, including at least four flights on which Maxwell was also present"
Opprinnelig skrevet av Vinz Clortho:
69%
Nice.
No other guesses?

The correct answer was Trump's Admin had only released 0.5% of the entire Epstein Files available. Trump is mentioned more than 1,500+ times in them.

0.5%
Opprinnelig skrevet av Azza ☠:
No other guesses?

The correct answer was Trump's Admin had only released 0.5% of the entire Epstein Files available. Trump is mentioned more than 1,500+ times in them.

0.5%
He was DM'ing Epstein like two kids who just got their first phones.
Jaxx 1 time siden 
Opprinnelig skrevet av Azza ☠:
No other guesses?

The correct answer was Trump's Admin had only released 0.5% of the entire Epstein Files available. Trump is mentioned more than 1,500+ times in them.

0.5%

Sounds very bad. Is it?
Opprinnelig skrevet av Jaxx:
Opprinnelig skrevet av Azza ☠:
No other guesses?

The correct answer was Trump's Admin had only released 0.5% of the entire Epstein Files available. Trump is mentioned more than 1,500+ times in them.

0.5%

Sounds very bad. Is it?
Considering the commitment they made, yes.

What reason would they have to stoke the very real doubts that are beginning to manifest in their base by shirking the commitment they themselves had lauded, especially with what allegations are on the line and what closure has yet to be reached?
100% chance that kentaro miura is not in the files, because hes my cutie sweet man who just loved to play his silly idol games and draw horrific dark fantasy arts.
Jaxx 1 time siden 
Opprinnelig skrevet av Gorgle:
Opprinnelig skrevet av Jaxx:

Sounds very bad. Is it?
Considering the commitment they made, yes.

What reason would they have to stoke the very real doubts that are beginning to manifest in their base by shirking the commitment they themselves had lauded, especially with what allegations are on the line and what closure has yet to be reached?

Okay. But the latest evidence points to the slimy infidelity of many Democrats.
Opprinnelig skrevet av Jaxx:
Opprinnelig skrevet av Gorgle:
Considering the commitment they made, yes.

What reason would they have to stoke the very real doubts that are beginning to manifest in their base by shirking the commitment they themselves had lauded, especially with what allegations are on the line and what closure has yet to be reached?

Okay. But the latest evidence points to the slimy infinitely of many Democrats.
Okay. Cool. Neat.

I didn't stutter.
Opprinnelig skrevet av Jaxx:
Opprinnelig skrevet av Gorgle:
Considering the commitment they made, yes.

What reason would they have to stoke the very real doubts that are beginning to manifest in their base by shirking the commitment they themselves had lauded, especially with what allegations are on the line and what closure has yet to be reached?

Okay. But the latest evidence points to the slimy infidelity of many Democrats.
No one cares; we're talking about Trump.
Jaxx 1 time siden 
Opprinnelig skrevet av Final Kat:
Opprinnelig skrevet av Jaxx:
Okay. But the latest evidence points to the slimy infidelity of many Democrats.
No one cares; we're talking about Trump.

Proceed, Bluesky.
Opprinnelig skrevet av Jaxx:
Opprinnelig skrevet av Final Kat:
No one cares; we're talking about Trump.

Proceed, Bluesky.
Proceed, to toss out the strawman.
Azza ☠ 9 minutter siden 
Opprinnelig skrevet av Jaxx:
Opprinnelig skrevet av Gorgle:
Considering the commitment they made, yes.

What reason would they have to stoke the very real doubts that are beginning to manifest in their base by shirking the commitment they themselves had lauded, especially with what allegations are on the line and what closure has yet to be reached?

Okay. But the latest evidence points to the slimy infidelity of many Democrats.

Guess how many Democrats are defending Bill Clinton, etc?

Guess how many MAGA cult worshippers are defending Trump, including his loyalists... specially Todd Blanche, Pam Bondi and Kash Patel?

Hint: Trump appointed Todd Blanche gave Ghislaine Maxwell reduced prison to minimum security, with benefits including cellphone calls, visitors, and a puppy dog to play with. Reason why was never given and denied when questioned about. She later that day said she didn't see Trump do anything wrong.
Sist redigert av Azza ☠; 4 minutter siden
< >
Viser 115 av 15 kommentarer
Per side: 1530 50