모든 토론 > Steam 포럼 > Off Topic > 제목 정보
Azza ☠ 9시간 전
Trump's Admin Epstein Files release failure!
Guess what precentage the Trump Admin has so far released of the Epstein Files before making a disclaimer that all the [REDACTED] statements in it about Donald J Trump are untrue...

"Some of these documents contain untrue and sensationalist claims made against President Trump that were submitted to the FBI right before the 2020 election. If they had a shred of credibility, they certainly would have been weaponized against President Trump already"

The first person to the closest percentage wins a bunch of Steam Points!
< >
전체 댓글 15개 중 1~15개 표시 중
Vinz Clortho 9시간 전 
69%
#1
Lime 9시간 전 
as a goth, i've been commonly mistaken as cosplaying as the epstein files. its not fair i seek recompense
#2
Azza ☠ 9시간 전 
Vinz Clortho 님이 먼저 게시:
69%

Cold...

"Donald Trump is listed as a passenger on at least eight flights between 1993 and 1996, including at least four flights on which Maxwell was also present"
#3
SirSeanicus 9시간 전 
Vinz Clortho 님이 먼저 게시:
69%
Nice.
#4
Azza ☠ 2시간 전 
No other guesses?

The correct answer was Trump's Admin had only released 0.5% of the entire Epstein Files available. Trump is mentioned more than 1,500+ times in them.

0.5%
#5
Final Kat 1시간 전 
Azza ☠ 님이 먼저 게시:
No other guesses?

The correct answer was Trump's Admin had only released 0.5% of the entire Epstein Files available. Trump is mentioned more than 1,500+ times in them.

0.5%
He was DM'ing Epstein like two kids who just got their first phones.
#6
Jaxx 1시간 전 
Azza ☠ 님이 먼저 게시:
No other guesses?

The correct answer was Trump's Admin had only released 0.5% of the entire Epstein Files available. Trump is mentioned more than 1,500+ times in them.

0.5%

Sounds very bad. Is it?
#7
Gorgle 1시간 전 
Jaxx 님이 먼저 게시:
Azza ☠ 님이 먼저 게시:
No other guesses?

The correct answer was Trump's Admin had only released 0.5% of the entire Epstein Files available. Trump is mentioned more than 1,500+ times in them.

0.5%

Sounds very bad. Is it?
Considering the commitment they made, yes.

What reason would they have to stoke the very real doubts that are beginning to manifest in their base by shirking the commitment they themselves had lauded, especially with what allegations are on the line and what closure has yet to be reached?
#8
salamander 1시간 전 
100% chance that kentaro miura is not in the files, because hes my cutie sweet man who just loved to play his silly idol games and draw horrific dark fantasy arts.
#9
Jaxx 1시간 전 
Gorgle 님이 먼저 게시:
Jaxx 님이 먼저 게시:

Sounds very bad. Is it?
Considering the commitment they made, yes.

What reason would they have to stoke the very real doubts that are beginning to manifest in their base by shirking the commitment they themselves had lauded, especially with what allegations are on the line and what closure has yet to be reached?

Okay. But the latest evidence points to the slimy infidelity of many Democrats.
#10
Gorgle 1시간 전 
Jaxx 님이 먼저 게시:
Gorgle 님이 먼저 게시:
Considering the commitment they made, yes.

What reason would they have to stoke the very real doubts that are beginning to manifest in their base by shirking the commitment they themselves had lauded, especially with what allegations are on the line and what closure has yet to be reached?

Okay. But the latest evidence points to the slimy infinitely of many Democrats.
Okay. Cool. Neat.

I didn't stutter.
#11
Final Kat 1시간 전 
Jaxx 님이 먼저 게시:
Gorgle 님이 먼저 게시:
Considering the commitment they made, yes.

What reason would they have to stoke the very real doubts that are beginning to manifest in their base by shirking the commitment they themselves had lauded, especially with what allegations are on the line and what closure has yet to be reached?

Okay. But the latest evidence points to the slimy infidelity of many Democrats.
No one cares; we're talking about Trump.
#12
Jaxx 1시간 전 
Final Kat 님이 먼저 게시:
Jaxx 님이 먼저 게시:
Okay. But the latest evidence points to the slimy infidelity of many Democrats.
No one cares; we're talking about Trump.

Proceed, Bluesky.
#13
Final Kat 1시간 전 
Jaxx 님이 먼저 게시:
Final Kat 님이 먼저 게시:
No one cares; we're talking about Trump.

Proceed, Bluesky.
Proceed, to toss out the strawman.
#14
Azza ☠ 11분 전 
Jaxx 님이 먼저 게시:
Gorgle 님이 먼저 게시:
Considering the commitment they made, yes.

What reason would they have to stoke the very real doubts that are beginning to manifest in their base by shirking the commitment they themselves had lauded, especially with what allegations are on the line and what closure has yet to be reached?

Okay. But the latest evidence points to the slimy infidelity of many Democrats.

Guess how many Democrats are defending Bill Clinton, etc?

Guess how many MAGA cult worshippers are defending Trump, including his loyalists... specially Todd Blanche, Pam Bondi and Kash Patel?

Hint: Trump appointed Todd Blanche gave Ghislaine Maxwell reduced prison to minimum security, with benefits including cellphone calls, visitors, and a puppy dog to play with. Reason why was never given and denied when questioned about. She later that day said she didn't see Trump do anything wrong.
Azza ☠ 님이 마지막으로 수정; 6분 전
#15
< >
전체 댓글 15개 중 1~15개 표시 중
페이지당 표시 개수: 1530 50

모든 토론 > Steam 포럼 > Off Topic > 제목 정보
게시 일시: 2025년 12월 23일 오전 9시 50분
게시글: 15
새로운 토론 시작

토론 규칙 및 가이드라인